Court Martial Lawyer | Korea Japan Attorney

Psychotherapist Patient Privilege in a Court Martial

2010-11-04T23:17:00.000-04:00

Rule 513. Psychotherapist Patient Privilege in a Court Martial

Court Martial Lawyers can assist with your military case.

Rule 513 provides a limited privilege for communications to psychotherapists and counselors. The privilege is applicable only to actions arising under the UCMJ and is not a broader doctor-patient privilege. In United States v. Rodriguez, 54 M.J. 156 (2000), the CAAF upheld the Army Court's decision that Jaffee v. Redmond does not establish a psychotherapist-patient privilege in the military. In United States v. Paaluhi, 54 M.J. 181 (2000), consistent with Rodriguez, the court held that Jaffe v. Redmond did not establish a psychotherapist-patient privilege in the military. The CAAF set aside the conviction, but, holding it was ineffective assistance for the defense counsel to ask the accused to talk to a Navy psychologist without first getting the psychologist appointed to the defense team. Quasi psychotherapist-patient privilege also exists under certain circumstances:

Where psychiatrist or psychotherapist is detailed to assist the defense team, communications are protected as part of lawyer-client confidentiality. See United States v. Tharpe, 38 M.J. 8, 15 n.5 (C.M.A. 1993)

Communications made by an accused as part of a sanity inquiry under Rule 302. See United States v. Toledo, 26 M.J. 104 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 488 M.J. 889 (1988). C

Confidentiality privilege for statements made during mental responsibility exams may not generally apply retroactively to exams which the military judge deems as adequate replacement for court-ordered R.C.M. 706 examinations. See United States v. English, 44 M.J. 612 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. 1996), rev‚ôd on other grounds, 47 M.J. 215 (1997).

Court Martial Lawyers

Court Martial Lawyers in Korea

2010-11-04T23:15:00.000-04:00

Court Martial Lawyers Korea

Case laws on privileges in the Military Justice System

Adultery. United States v. Taylor, 64 M.J. 416 (C.A.A.F. 2007). Adultery is a crime ‚against the person or property of the other spouse. So, if a spouse is charged with adultery, the marital privilege, pursuant to M.R.E. 504(c)(2)(A) does not apply to communications about the adultery.

Presumption of Confidentiality. In United States v. McCollum, 58 M.J. 323 (2003), the appellant raped his wife's 14-year-old sister, who was staying with the family for a summer visit. He communicated various statements to his wife about the incident. During trial, the military judge admitted two of the statements, stating that the appellant did not prove the intent to hold the communications confidential. The CAAF set aside, stating that marital communications have a presumption of confidentiality. When the party claiming the privilege has shown that the communication was made privately during a valid marriage, the burden shifts to the opposing party to overcome the presumption.

Joint-Participant Exception. Although civilian federal courts accept the joint-participant exception to the marital privilege, the joint-participant exception does not apply in military cases. See United States v. Custis, 65 M.J. 366 (C.A.A.F. 2007). In Custis, the Court held that unlike privileges in the federal civilian courts that evolve based on case law, privileges in the military system are specifically delineated. So, the only exceptions are those expressly authorized. Hence, there is no joint-participant exception to the marital privilege. The ACCA in United States v. Davis, 61 M.J. 530 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 2005) had earlier recognized a joint-participant exception to marital communications privilege.

Military Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Procedures - UCMJ Sex Crimes

2010-07-09T10:17:00.000-04:00

Military Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Procedures - UCMJ Sex Crimes under DoDI 6495.02

Here are some of the policies governing sex crime response involving Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps sexual assault and rape cases. If you are accused of a sex crime under the UCMJ, then contact an experienced court martial defense lawyer to learn your rights.

5.7. The Secretaries of the Military Departments shall:

5.7.1. Establish comprehensive policies, procedures, and programs implementing this Instruction and consistent with Reference (c), and ensure implementation, monitoring, and evaluation at all levels of military command, including those levels at the National Guard and Reserve components, and training for members of their Military Departments. Program requirements and procedures are further detailed in Enclosure 3.

5.7.2. Establish required standards for command assessment of organizational SAPR climate, to include periodic follow-up assessments.

5.7.3. Publicize policies and procedures for reporting a sexual assault and provide information regarding the availability of medical treatment, advocacy, and referral services.

5.7.3.1. Ensure Service members are aware of the reporting options available to them, to include any exceptions and/or limitations on use applicable to each option. Information on the reporting options available to Service members is included in Reference (c).

5.7.3.2. Personnel shall be made aware that sexual assault includes rape, nonconsensual sodomy, indecent assault, and attempts to commit these acts, which are crimes in violation of specific articles of Chapter 47 of Reference (b).

5.7.3.3. Ensure that victims of unrestricted reports of sexual assaults are afforded throughout the investigative and legal process the information outlined in DoD Directive 1030.1 and DoD Instruction 1030.2 (References (v) and (w)).

5.7.4. Provide quarterly and annual reports of sexual assault involving members of the Armed Forces to DoD SAPRO to be consolidated into the Secretary of Defense annual reports to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in accordance with Sections 113 and 4331 of Reference (b), and Reference (c). (See Enclosure 8 for additional information on report requirements.)

5.7.5. Annually identify the fiscal and personnel resources necessary to implement, monitor, and evaluate the SAPR policies, and report these resource totals to USD(P&R).

5.7.6. Provide budget program and obligation data, as requested to DoD SAPRO.

Sex Crime Court Martial Defense Lawyer - Military Attorney

Criminal Defense Lawyer

2010-01-10T00:45:00.000-05:00

Former State Rep. T.D. El Amin Sentenced To 18 Months

Posted at http://www.fox2now.com/news/ktvi-td-el-amin-sentenced-bribe-010610,0,2750312.story

ST. LOUIS, MO -- (KTVI - FOX2now.com) - The third Missouri politician to plead guilty under a federal anti-public corruption campaign failed Wednesday to convince a judge to be lenient. U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey ordered 39-year Talibdin "TD" El-Amin of St. Louis to serve 18 months in federal prison and two years of supervised release for soliciting and accepting a bribe of $2100. He was also ordered to pay back the bribe money.

Standing before the federal judge, El-Amin admitted he broke the law and must accept the consequences. "I detest myself," he told Autrey. His lawyer, Paul D'Agrosa told the judge his client's actions were "aberrant conduct" and he deserved a sentence less than the federal guidelines of 18 to 24 months. D'Agrosa pointed to El-Amin's previous efforts to help those in his north St. Louis community, his willingness to support his five children and his generosity in donating a kidney to his father. "Twelve months and a day is sufficient to address this crime and still serve as punishment," D'Agrosa said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Hal Goldsmith disagreed arguing El-Amin "sold his public office and used the power of his office to prey on constituents." Goldsmith added, "what citizens got was a classic shakedown."

The conviction derailed what had been a promising political career for the northside politician. He was elected to the 57th district seat after his wife, State Representative Yaphett El-Amin vacated it to seek the Democratic nomination for the fourth Senate District seat in 2006. She lost that race to Democrat Jeff Smith who is now serving a year long federal prison term for lying to federal agents about campaign activities during his 2004 bid for Congress. "TD" El-Amin had been considered a frontrunner for Smith's Missouri Senate seat until he too ran afoul of the law.

El-Amin pled guilty in September 2009 to one count of soliciting and accepting a bribe after he learned federal agents had surveillance video showing him accepting cash from a small business owner and passing written notes about the bribe in his state representative office. The business owner had asked El-Amin for help dealing with St. Louis City inspectors who were impacting his business. The man subsequently sought help from federal authorities who launched an undercover investigation.
----------
Court Martial Defense Lawyer Defending Cases in Okinawa Japan, Yongsan Korea, Camp Casey, Camp Zama Japan, Military Attorney

Yongsan Korea Court Martial Lawyer Defends Command sergeant major

2010-01-09T15:47:00.000-05:00

Yongsan Korea Court Martial Lawyer Tim Bilecki Defends Command sergeant major

CSM pleads guilty after sexual contact with subordinate

By Jon Rabiroff, Stars and Stripes
December 18, 2009

Command Sgt. Maj. Antonio Holder pleaded guilty to fraternization with a subordinate enlisted man Tuesday and was sentenced to a reduction in rank to an E-8 and a formal reprimand.
CAMP CASEY, South Korea — A brief moment of sexual contact between a senior noncommissioned officer and a subordinate sent both soldiers down different roads of guilt and despair.

Command Sgt. Maj. Antonio Holder found himself ostracized by his peers, and his impressive 29-year military career tarnished as he faced a court-martial. His former driver, a specialist, said the May incident left him unable to eat or sleep normally and with scars on his arms that he attributed to self-inflicted wounds resulting from depression. He said he has repeatedly attempted suicide.

Ultimately, Holder pleaded guilty to fraternizing with a subordinate enlisted man and was sentenced to a reduction in rank to E-8 and a formal reprimand, but not before a daylong sentencing hearing Tuesday at Camp Casey that featured dramatic testimony from the two men about how their lives spiraled downward after an incident that began with a graphic sexual discussion.

“It’s hard to respect … my leaders because I don’t know who I can trust,” the former driver testified. “I used to love the Army. Now I do it because I have to.”

Holder said, “I am truly sorry for the hurt, the shame and the embarrassment that I have brought to all. I am here today pleading guilty to take responsibility and be held accountable for my actions.”

The specialist was assigned to be Holder’s driver earlier this year when both were with the 2nd Infantry Division’s Special Troops Battalion based at Camp Red Cloud in Uijeongbu. On May 13, on a drive between Red Cloud and Yongsan Garrison, Holder said he and his driver got into a discussion “of a sexual nature.” Before Holder could go into greater detail, the judge, Lt. Col. Thomas Kulish, closed the courtroom to spectators, citing the nature of the testimony to come.

However, in his closing argument, defense attorney Capt. Tim Bilecki said that during the discussion in the vehicle between Holder and his driver, the specialist repeatedly bragged about the size of his penis.

The two men disagree about whether what happened next was invited, but Holder admitted in court that he then reached over, undid the driver’s pants, reached in and “brushed up against” the specialist’s crotch through his boxers.

“It was not done for any sexual gratification, but because I was tired of hearing about his penis,” Holder testified. “I should have just ordered him to stop talking about it. … I had a momentary lapse in judgment, and before it registered, the mistake was already made.

“This is no excuse, however,” he continued. “My actions were completely wrong. I was … the supervisor in that situation who knew better and should have never allowed the conversation to take the inappropriate turn that it did.”

Holder is married, and his wife of three years testified by telephone from her North Carolina home during the hearing in support of her husband.

-----
Court Martial Defense Lawyer Defending Cases in Okinawa Japan, Yongsan Korea, Camp Casey, Camp Zama Japan, Military Attorney

Hearing held in Ellsworth Air Force Base court martial proceedings: Court Martial Lawyer

2010-01-09T15:43:00.002-05:00

Hearing held in Ellsworth Air Force Base court martial proceedings: Court Martial Lawyer

Associated Press - January 6, 2010 6:25 AM ET

ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D. (AP) - A hearing at Ellsworth Air Force Base will determine if there's enough evidence to proceed with a military trial against airman Vinny Santana.

The Wednesday hearing is the military equivalent of grand jury proceedings in civilian court.

The 22-year-old Ellsworth airman allegedly wounded another airman in an off-base shooting in September.

The state dropped attempted murder charges against Santana and the case was turned over to the military.
---------
Court Martial Defense Lawyer Defending Cases in Okinawa Japan, Yongsan Korea, Camp Casey, Camp Zama Japan, Military Attorney

Camp Zama Japan Court Martial Defense Lawyer

2010-01-09T15:42:00.000-05:00

Court Martial Defense Lawyer

State moves to remove officer by court martial
Says Guard aide misused funds

By Andrea Estes
Posted at the Boston.com
Written by the Globe Staff / January 9, 2010

A top official in the Massachusetts National Guard faces possible removal by court-martial after state and federal investigations uncovered a range of alleged improprieties, including misusing federal money, hiring a convicted felon to do legal work, and threatening a whistleblower.

Quartermaster Mark P. Murray, who oversees all state-owned National Guard property, has been on paid leave since April, when the head of the Guard, Adjutant General Joseph Carter, questioned Murray’s handling of federal funds and asked the state auditor and the US Army to investigate.

Though none of the investigations or audits by five federal and state agencies turned up criminal wrongdoing, Murray, who makes $145,000 a year and collects a federal military pension, is accused of violating a host of federal and state rules and regulations.

Yesterday, Murray received a hand-delivered letter accusing him of “waste, fraud, and abuse’’ and ordering him to resign by day’s end or face a court-martial convened by Governor Deval Patrick. State officials could not find a documented court-martial in recent Massachusetts history.

Murray informed the Guard that he would fight the charges, officials said.

Read the entire article at http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/01/09/mass_moves_to_court_martial_key_national_guard_quartermaster/
-----------
Court Martial Defense Lawyer Defending Cases in Okinawa Japan, Yongsan Korea, Camp Casey, Camp Zama Japan, Military Attorney